USPTO serial 77564442
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK B. HARRISON
MARCIA A AUBERGER VENABLE LLPP.O. Box 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising agencies; creation of marketing tools designed to increase a client company's knowledge of customer needs, and its competitors' products and services, pricing, advertising strategy and sales strategy; brand concept and brand development services for corporate clients social media strategy and marketing consultancy focusing on helping clients create and extend their product and brand strategies by building vitally engaging marketing solutions; brand concept and brand development services for corporate clients; services relating to the analysis, evaluation, creation and brand establishment of trademarks, trade names and domain names; brand strategy consultancy; business consultancy regarding internal and external business communication; business management consulting with relation to strategy and marketing matters; cost analyses and cost accounting; conducting of marketing studies; consultancy services, namely, advisory services in managerial and marketing strategic terms in the fields of brand development and branding; cost assessment services; cost accounting; development of marketing strategies and concepts; market analysis; market research services; advertising and marketing; marketing analysis; advertising and business management consultancy; public opinion polling; services relating to the analysis, evaluation, creation and brand establishment of trademarks, trade names and domain names; statistical evaluations of marketing data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |