USPTO serial 77564645
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Dolberg
DAVID DOLBERG DAVID DOLBERG ATTORNEY AT LAW2163 MEEKER AVE # 116RICHMOND, CA 94804-6410UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Compacts containing make-up; Cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes; Emery boards; Emery paper; Pre-moistened cosmetic tissues; Pre-moistened cosmetic wipes | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Manicure implements, namely, nail files, nail clippers, cuticle pushers, tweezers, nail and cuticle scissors; Pedicure implements, namely, nail files, nail clippers, cuticle pushers, tweezers, nail and cuticle scissors | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Facial tissue; Paper tissues for cosmetic use; Tissues of paper for removing make-up | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Combs; Compacts containing dental floss and also including lip gloss; Compacts sold empty; Cosmetic brushes; Dental floss; Dental floss dispensers; Dental flossers; Dental tape; Eyebrow brushes; Hair combs; Hair, nail and tooth brushes; Lip brushes; Make-up brushes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |