Drawing for PEEKY

USPTO serial 77564800

PEEKY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEEKY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keum J. Park

KEUM J. PARK MAYER & WILLIAMS PC251 NORTH AVENUE WEST2ND FLOORWESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1499

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Foot and hand care creams, lotions, and gels; nail care preparations; body and beauty care creams, lotions, and gels; non-medicated foot creams; foot and hand massage creams, lotions, gels, and oils; foot and nail grooming products, namely, tips, glue, nail polish, creams, cleansers, scrubs, and oils; soaps and cleansers for hand, foot, face, and body; non-medicated bath preparationsACTIVE
025Socks and stockings; open-toe socks and stockings; hosiery; pedicure socks; pedicure socks with removable toe cap; pedicure slippers; pedicure sandals; manicure gloves; gloves for personal hand conditioning use; maternity shoes and maternity socks; athletic footwear; anti-perspirant socks; sports socks, namely, socks made of a moisture wicking material; water shoesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 29, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 29, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 6, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 27, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance