Drawing for CASTILLO RUM/RHUM ANEJO

USPTO serial 77564969

CASTILLO RUM/RHUM ANEJO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASTILLO RUM/RHUM ANEJO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Rum; alcoholic cocktails containing rumACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 20, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 20, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 7, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Feb 24, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Feb 23, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jan 4, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 22, 2009RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Oct 22, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Oct 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 30, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 30, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 30, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 30, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 20, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Sep 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance