Drawing for CONTOUR COLLECTION

USPTO serial 77565257

CONTOUR COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONTOUR COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. May

DAVID L. MAY NIXON PEABODY LLP401 9TH STREET NWSUITE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, tops, bottoms, jackets and dressesACTIVEAug 15, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 30, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 30, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 14, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 7, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2010UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 6, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 6, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 4, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 4, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2008PMSGPETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 10, 2008PDMSPETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance