USPTO serial 77566574
BATTLE ANGEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BATTLE ANGEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Coral Gables, FL
Coral Gables, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Battery operated action toys; Bendable toys; Collectable toy figures; Construction toys; Disc toss toys; Electric action toys; Electronic action toys; Electronic learning toys; Electronic toy vehicles; Electronically operated toy motor vehicles; Fantasy character toys; Flying saucers; Hand-powered non-mechanical flying toy; Inflatable toys; Inflatable toys showing decorative pictures; Mechanical action toys; Mechanical toys; Molded toy figures; Plastic character toys; Plush toys; Pop up toys; Positionable printed toy figures for use in games; Positionable printed toy figures for use in puzzles; Positionable three dimensional toys for use in games; Positionable toy figures; Positionable two dimensional toys for use in games; Push toys; Radio controlled toy vehicles; Remote control toys, namely, flying saucer; Rubber character toys; Sketching toys; Stuffed and plush toys; Stuffed toys; Talking electronic press-down toy; Talking toys; Tossing disc toys; Toy action figures; Toy action figures and accessories therefor; Toy and novelty face masks; Toy armor; Toy buildings and accessories therefor; Toy cars; Toy figures; Toy film cartridges and viewers; Toy masks; Toy model kit cars; Toy robots; Toy swords; Toy vehicles and accessories therefor; Toy vehicles with transforming parts; Toy watches; Toy weapons; Toy, namely, battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects; Toys, namely, a disk to toss in playing a game wherein other disks are flipped and collected; Toys, namely, children's dress-up accessories; Transforming robotic toy vehicles; Transforming robotic toys; Two and three dimensional positionable figures sold as an integral component of toys; Two and three dimensional positionable toy figures sold as a unit with educational books; Two and three dimensional positionable toy figures sold as a unit with memory training equipment; Two and three dimensional positionable toy figures sold as a unit with other toys; Wind-up toys; Wind-up walking toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |