Drawing for FULL RENDER/FULL RECOVER

USPTO serial 77568045

FULL RENDER/FULL RECOVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FULL RENDER/FULL RECOVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael I. Kroll

MICHAEL I KROLL80 SKYLINE DRIVESUITE 304PLAINVIEW, NY 11803

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power winches; Trawl winches; WinchesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 28, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 28, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 12, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Sep 21, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Sep 21, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Sep 21, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Aug 16, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 28, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 8, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 28, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 8, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 8, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance