USPTO serial 77568417
LOVE NEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOVE NEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arlen L. Olsen
ARLEN L. OLSEN SCHMEISER, OLSEN & WATTS22 CENTURY HILL DR STE 302LATHAM, NY 12110-2137UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | shower curtain hooks, upholstered furniture; decorative pillows not for use with beds, decorative cushions not for use with beds, decorative cushion covers not for use with beds, fitted fabric chair covers, seat cushions | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | lotion bottles and pumps sold empty, toothbrush holders, soap dishes, vases; glass jars; serving utensils, namely serving spoons and serving forks; drinking glasses, and dishes; decorative wine bottle covers in the form of bottle jackets made of fabric coverings to protect and decorate glass bottles | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | fabrics for textile use; upholstery fabric for furniture; home decor products, namely, curtains and throws; bathroom textile products, namely, bath, hand, face, beach and body towels, hooded towels, textile toilet seat covers; kitchen textile products, namely, tablecloths, table runners, napkins, placemats, kitchen towels, oven mitts, pot holders, dishcloths, unfitted fabric chair covers, shower curtains | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Rugs, bath mats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |