USPTO serial 77568752
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Emeryville, CA
Emeryville, CA
Emeryville, CA
EMERYVILLE, CA
EMERYVILLE, CA
EMERYVILLE, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer C. Debrow
Jennifer C. Debrow GRAY PLANT MOOTY MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A.80 South Eighth Street500 IDS CenterMinneapolis, MN 55402| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | [ Food products, namely, coffee, cocoa, tea, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, ] breakfast cereals, cereal based snack foods, ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; [ bread, pastries; confectionery, namely, chocolate, confectionery chips for baking, crystal sugar pieces, confectionery ices, namely, frozen yogurt, fruit jellies, peanut butter confectionery chips, ices, namely, fruit ices, flavored ices, ice cream; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard, vinegar, condiments, namely, pepper sauce, soy sauce, spices, ice, seasonings, flavorings for non-nutritional purposes, flavor enhancers for non-nutritional purposes used in food and beverage products, pepper, dressings, namely, salad dressings, mayonnaise, sugar, natural sweeteners; hydrolyzed protein for seasoning purposes; rice noodles, instant noodles, pastas; ] prepared meals, processed meals [, dried meals ] and cooked meals consisting primarily of rice, noodles [, dumplings ] and pasta; [ meat tenderizers, sweets, namely, gum sweets, sugar free sweets, candies, ] cookies; [ biscuits and chewing gum, ] cereal based nutrient-dense snack bars [, energy gels made primarily of brown rice flour; grain-based food bars containing fruits and nuts; fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce; corn chips ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2010 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 17, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |