USPTO serial 77569383
BUENAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2010
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BUENAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Caloocan City, PH
Caloocan City, PH
Caloocan City, PH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kam Louie
Kam Louie LAW OFFICES OF KAM LOUIE301 N LAKE AVE STE 1000PASADENA, CA 91101-4131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products in the nature of Asian-style fruit preserves, namely, banana chips, nata de coco, kaong- palm fruit preserve, halo-halo mixed fruits and beans preserve, red mung bean preserves, red mongo-read mung bean preserves, white bean preserves, langka-jackfruit preserves, macapuno-mutant coconut preserves, ube-sweet purple yam preserves, matamis na saging-banana preserves and sago and tapioca pearls; Canned fruits, namely, gata coconut milk; Asian-style frozen fruits and vegetables, namely, kamoteng kahoy-cassava, ube-purple yam, gata coconut milk, kinoyad na buko-shredded coconut, kinoyad na Niyog-coconut, saluyot-jute leaves, dahon ng malunggay-horseradish leaves, bunga ng malunggay-horseradish fruits, dahon ng ampalaya-bitter melon leaves, dahon ng kamote-sweet potato leaves, alokon-birch flower, bulaklak ng katuray -sesban flowers, nilagang saging-bananas | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2006 |
| 030 | Packaged noodles; pastry wrappers, namely, eggroll and lumpia wrappers; and Asian-style sauces and sauce mixes, namely, shrimp fry sauce, oyster sauce, soy sauce, kare-kare sauce mixes, sinigang sauce mixes, sweet and sour sauce mixes, palabok sauce mixes and Asian adobo sauce mixes | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GEM FOODS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GEM FOODS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GEM FOODS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BUENAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 5, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 5, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 9, 2010 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |