Drawing for TAPPII

USPTO serial 77571498

TAPPII

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAPPII?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B.G. Horowitz, Esq.

ROBERT B.G. HOROWITZ, ESQ. BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP45 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10111-0100UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Contactless card systems, comprising a credit card sized-card featuring an integrated circuit chip and battery which is read by a contactless reading machine for use as electronic tickets, credit and identification cards; integrated circuit chips; integrated circuit cards; integrated circuit card readers/writers; mobile telephones; software for developing electronic money system, electronic ticket system, home/office security system, membership/ID card system, and point rewarding system; computer software for controlling and managing access server applicationsACTIVE
035Advertising services, namely, distribution and dissemination of advertising materials; provision of commercial information in the field of transactions of computer goods, business management and advice; market research; computerized file management; on-line advertising on a computer network; electronic commerce services, namely, providing information about products via telecommunication networks for advertising and sale purposes; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line communications network on the Internet; providing business information via a website, file sharing, and information portal in the field of e-commerceACTIVE
036Electronic money services, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment by connecting to a network or using integrated circuit cards containing integrated chips and batteries, credit card services, debit card services, electronic funds transfer services; and issuing stored value cards for use as electronic travel ticketsACTIVE
038Electronic mail and messaging services; content delivery services, namely, electronic transmission of messages and dataACTIVE
041On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring information for daily livingACTIVE
042computer application software design via a global computer network; design of computer application software used for creating common areas for electronic storage of data via a global computer network; maintenance of computer application software and application software used for creating common areas for electronic storage of data; computer services, namely, creating, hosting, and maintaining weblogs for othersACTIVE
045On-line social networking servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 4, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 29, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance