USPTO serial 77571716
AQUAFRESH ENAMELOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AQUAFRESH ENAMELOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Philadelphia, PA
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Philadelphia, PA
WILMINGTON, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles M. Atkinson
Charles M Atkinson GLAXOSMITHKLINEOne Franklin Plaza, 200 North 16th St.LGTM - FP2030Philadelphia, PA 19102-1225Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toothpaste | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SmithKline Beecham Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SmithKline Beecham Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named AQUAFRESH ENAMELOCK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 23, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |