USPTO serial 77571720
INTRALOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PILARO, MARK F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTRALOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott E. Thompson
SCOTT E. THOMPSON GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP200 PARK AVE FL 34NEW YORK, NY 10166-0005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automatic machines, namely, automatic vending machines operating by inserting a metal coin; automatic machines, namely, automatic vending machines operating by inserting special printed matter | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games, namely, scratch cards for playing lottery games; Printed tickets and blank paper slips specially designed for participation in games of chance, numerical lotteries, instant lotteries tickets; blank paper betting slips and printed tickets specially designed for playing games of chance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |