USPTO serial 77571723
PROFIT POWER ECONOMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROFIT POWER ECONOMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel I. Schloss
MIA DE KUIJPER715 PARK AVENUE#11BNEW YORK, NY 10021Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded DVDs, CDs and downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters and books in the field of applied business economics | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | newsletters and a series of books in the field of applied business economics | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | consulting and advisory services in the field of applied business economics | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 7, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |