Drawing for ECOEDGE

USPTO serial 77571728

ECOEDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRAZIER, TAMARA G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOEDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa A. Iverson

LISA A IVERSON NEAL & MCDEVITT LLC1776 ASH STREETNORTHFIELD, IL 60093UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Thermoplastic fibers and pellets for use in further manufactureACTIVENov 25, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 18, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 8, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 8, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 19, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Sep 16, 2010RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES
Aug 27, 2010GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Aug 27, 2010GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Aug 27, 2010CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN
Jul 1, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 7, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 7, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 25, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Mar 25, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Mar 25, 2010CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
Feb 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 26, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 7, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Nov 7, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2009CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 13, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2009CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2009SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Sep 14, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 18, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Aug 18, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 7, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 1, 2008UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED
Dec 1, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 1, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 1, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 1, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 26, 2008UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED
Nov 26, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 23, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Sep 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance