USPTO serial 77571794
EPICURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPICURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Billy C. Raulerson
BILLY C. RAULERSON CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD, LLP21 E STATE ST STE 1100COLUMBUS, OH 43215-4243UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Non-electric knives; foil cutters; muddlers | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Oven liners | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Non-electric kitchen utensils, namely, turners, stirrers, food strainers, and spatulas; kitchen utensil sets comprised primarily of turners, stirrers, food strainers, spatulas, and a container storage bin; coasters; trivets; cutting boards; graters; ice cream scoops; garlic presses; whisks; non-electric can openers; non-electric peelers; non-electric pizza cutters; colanders; mixing bowls; rolling pins; steamer baskets; baking mats; utensils for barbecues, namely, forks, tongs, and turners; barware, namely, corkscrews, cocktail shakers, wine collars, and drink strainers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |