Drawing for SCENT-SIBLES

USPTO serial 77572258

SCENT-SIBLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCENT-SIBLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tracy-Gene G. Durkin

TRACY-GENE G. DURKIN Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.1100 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Blank writing journals; Crayons; Ink stamps; Markers; StickersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Mar 22, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Mar 20, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Mar 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Oct 3, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 29, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 29, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Apr 21, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED
Apr 20, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 20, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 11, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 29, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 29, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Oct 21, 2010NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED
Oct 20, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 20, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 15, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Sep 29, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 29, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Mar 29, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 29, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 7, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 17, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 28, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 28, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 28, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 28, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 28, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 27, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Apr 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 24, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 24, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 24, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 23, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Sep 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance