USPTO serial 77572603
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne F. Bradley
Tiffany A. Parcher CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLP.P.O. BOX 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SPORTS AND FITNESS CLOTHING, NAMELY, FOOTWEAR, PADDED JACKETS, HATS AND CAPS, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS, BANDANAS, BASEBALL CAPS, BATHING SUITS, BATHING SUITS FOR MEN, BATHING TRUNKS, BEACHWEAR, BEANIES, BERMUDA SHORTS, BIKINIS, BLAZERS, BOARD SHORTS, BODY SHIRTS, BOTTOMS, BRAS, BRIEFS, BUTTON-FRONT ALOHA SHIRTS, CARGO PANTS, PADDED SHORTS, PADDED PANTS, PADDED SHIRTS, COATS, CROP TOPS, FLEECE PULLOVERS, FLEECE SHORTS, GOLF CAPS, GOLF PANTS, GOLF SHIRTS, GOLF SKIRTS, GOLF TROUSERS, GYM SHORTS, GYM SUITS, HALTER TOPS, HEAD SWEATBANDS, HOODED SWEAT SHIRTS, SOCKS, JEANS, JERSEYS, MEN'S JACKETS, MEN'S COATS, MEN'S VESTS, MEN'S SOCKS, MEN'S SUITS, WOMEN'S SUITS, MINISKIRTS, MUSCLE TOPS, POLO SHIRTS, SHORT SETS, SHORT TROUSERS, SHORTS, SHORT-SLEEVED OR LONG SLEEVED T-SHIRTS, SKIRTS, SKULL CAPS, SOCKS, STOCKINGS, SPORT COATS, SPORT SHIRTS, SPORT STOCKINGS, SPORTS BRAS, SPORTS JACKETS, SPORTS JERSEYS, SPORTS PANTS, SPORTS SHIRTS, SWEAT BANDS, SWEAT JACKETS, SWEAT PANTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, SWEAT SHORTS, SWEAT SUITS, SWEATSOCKS, TANK TOPS, TEE SHIRTS, TRACK JACKETS, TRACK PANTS, TRACK SUITS, UNDERSHIRTS, VISORS, VOLLEYBALL SHOES, WRIST BANDS, YOGA PANTS AND YOGA SHIRTS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 10, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |