USPTO serial 77572668
HORSE THIEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HORSE THIEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Stringham, Esq.
John C. Stringham, Esq. Workman Nydegger1000 Eagle Gate Tower60 East South TempleSalt Lake City, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Inflatable mattress for use when camping, metal furniture and furniture for camping, sleeping bags for camping | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, briefs and boxer briefs, board shorts, coats, coverups, crewnecks, denim jackets, denim pants, fabric belts, fleece pullovers, fleece jackets, jackets, jeans, knit shirts, jumpsuits, leather jackets, leather pants, leggings, loungewear, mittens, trousers, vests, nightwear, outdoor gloves, parkas, pajamas, ponchos, polo shirts, raincoats, robes, scarves, shirts, shorts, sleepwear, socks, sweat suits, sweat shirts, sweat pants, sweaters, swimwear, tank tops, t-shirts, undergarments, wristbands; headgear, namely, caps, hats and visors; footwear, namely, flipflops, rubber shoes, sandals, canvas shoes, leather shoes and boots; insoles for shoes, slippers, sneakers | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Canned or bottled fruits and vegetables, dried fruits and vegetables, canned or bottled cooked meat, canned or bottled fish, dehydrated fruit snacks; food snack composed of uncooked ingredients, namely, fruit-based organic food bars that incorporate organic dates, organic raisins, organic honey, and organic agave nectar; vegetable shortening, fruit-based sandwich spread, meat-based sandwich spread, canned and frozen fruits and vegetables, frozen fish and poultry, dairy products, namely, cheese and butter, canned evaporated milk, and miscellaneous grocery products, namely, mincemeat, processed shelled nuts, apple sauce, jellies and jams, dried fruits, processed olives, peanut butter, olive oil, and pickles; prepared, ready-to-eat foods, namely, tofu, braised tofu, baked tofu, smoked tofu, tofu salad, soy cheese, soybean milk, tempeh, hummus, tofu-veggie burger patties, soy-based sour cream substitute, and soy-based yogurt; organic egg products, namely, liquid and frozen eggs; plain, salted, sugared organic whole egg; salted and sugared organic egg yolk; organic egg whites; dry organic egg product, namely, dehydrated eggs; organic whole egg, organic egg yolks, organic egg shell powder; organic milk; meat and meat products, namely organic beef, turkey, pork and chicken | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRENTWOOD INVESTMENTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BRENTWOOD INVESTMENTS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named HORSE THIEF
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |