USPTO serial 77580250
ZEN GOLF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZEN GOLF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Culver City, CA
Culver City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence H. Binderow
LAWRENCE H. BINDEROW BINDEROW LAW OFFICES1330 CAMINO DEL MARSTE 250DEL MAR, CA 92014-2508Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING; NAMELY, SHIRTS, GOLF-SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, UNDERSHIRTS, NIGHT SHIRTS, SWEATERS, SWEATSHIRTS, VESTS, JACKETS, COATS, TIES, BELTS FOR CLOTHING, PANTS, TROUSERS, SHORTS, BOXER SHORTS, UNDERWEAR, BRIEFS, PAJAMA SHIRT TOPS, PAJAMA BOTTOMS, SWEATPANTS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, SWIMWEAR, BOARD SHORTS, HOSIERY, SOCKS, JOGGING SUITS, BANDANAS, NECKERCHIEFS, SCARVES, RAIN COATS, WIND-RESISTANT JACKETS, PONCHOS, BATH ROBES, GLOVES, MITTENS AND HEADWEAR, NAMELY, HATS, GOLF CAPS, CAPS AND VISORS AND HEAD BANDS; AND FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, GOLF SHOES, DRESS FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, LEATHER SHOES, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, CASUAL FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, CASUAL FOOTWEAR, BOOTS, SANDALS AND BEACH FOOTWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |