USPTO serial 77593536
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Montreal, Québec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
575 ROUTE 28RARITAN, NJ 08869-1354UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Baby bunting; Bandanas; Baseball caps; Bathing suits; Bathrobes; Beachwear; Blazers; Blouses; Body shapers; Body suits; Bottoms; Boxer shorts; Brassieres; Briefs; Camisoles; Caps; Cardigans; Clothing, namely, wrap-arounds; Coats; Denim jackets; Dresses; Footwear; Gloves; Halter tops; Hats; Headwear; Infant sleepers; Infant wear; Jackets; Jeans; Jerseys; Jogging pants; Jumpers; Kerchiefs; Leggings; Lingerie; Nightgowns; Overalls; Pajamas; Pants; Polo shirts; Ponchos; Pullovers; Raincoats; Rainwear; Robes; Shapewear, namely, bras, girdles, panties, waist cinchers, tummy tucking girdles, tummy and waist trimming cinchers; Shirts; Shorts; Skirts; Slacks; Sleeping garments; Sleepwear; Socks; Stretch pants; Suits; Sweat pants; Sweat shirts; Sweaters; Swimwear; T-shirts; Tank tops; Tights; Tops; Track pants; Trench coats; Trousers; Undergarments; Undershirts; Underwear; Uniforms; Vests; Visors; Wraps | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |