Drawing for EARACHE RELIEF

USPTO serial 77597459

EARACHE RELIEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3786383Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 4, 2010
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EARACHE RELIEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John D. Long

John D. Long LONG & CHYBIK1755 East Plumb Lane, Suite 107RENO, NV 89502UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005homeopathic pharmaceuticals for treating earache in peopleSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJan 15, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2021NCS7NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 7 SURRENDER EMAILED
Jan 12, 2021C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Jan 11, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 28, 2020C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED
Oct 28, 2020ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED
Oct 27, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Oct 27, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 27, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 27, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
May 4, 2019REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
May 23, 2016NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED
May 23, 20168.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
May 23, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 4, 2016ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED
May 4, 2010R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 31, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 31, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 18, 2010AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2010CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Mar 17, 2010IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Mar 17, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 17, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 16, 2010AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 16, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Feb 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 15, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Feb 15, 2010EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Aug 14, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 14, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 27, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance