USPTO serial 77608814
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Prodigy Energy Recovery Systems Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Prodigy Energy Recovery Systems Inc.
Prodigy Energy Recovery Systems Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Prodigy Energy Recovery Systems Inc.
Prodigy Energy Recovery Systems Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Prodigy Energy Recovery Systems Inc.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Heat exchangers for the recovery of energy from waste fluids | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 29, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |