USPTO serial 77614379
EYEFIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EYEFIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | ophthalmic devices for immobilizing an eye during an ophthalmic procedure | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |