Drawing for VARI

USPTO serial 77622566

VARI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VARI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas H. Siegel

DOUGLAS H. SIEGEL PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT & LITTON, LLPPO BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-2567UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products used in laboratory research, namely, antibodies, DNA, RNA, oligonucleotides, proteins, polypeptides, diagnostic preparations, diagnostic reagents, diagnostic peptides, cells, biological tissue, namely, pathological tissue and serum for use in scientific and medical researchACTIVE
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of cancer, hematology, optical disorders, neurodegenerative disorders, cardiovascular disorders, and bone and joint disordersACTIVE
009Bioinformatics software in the field of translational research; database management software for organizing, tracking and searching information about pathological samples; software in the field of education featuring instruction in science, business, or teaching; glass slides; microarray chips for use in scientific, laboratory, or medical research; and a slide maker for placing a barrier on a slide for use in scientific researchACTIVE
016Educational publications, namely, books, handouts, worksheets, workbooks, in the fields of science, business, or teachingACTIVE
025Clothing, namely, shirts, sweaters, vests and capsACTIVE
031Live animals for researchACTIVE
044medical services, namely, medical analysis services relating to the treatment of personsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 9, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 9, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 9, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 9, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 9, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 5, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Dec 28, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Dec 16, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 16, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 16, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2009GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 16, 2009GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 16, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 26, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 26, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 26, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 26, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 27, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance