USPTO serial 77622662
MODIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MODIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bolingbrook, IL
Bolingbrook, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth S. McLaughlin, Jr.
KENNETH S. MCLAUGHLIN, JR. ESP, KREUZER, CORES & MCLAUGHLIN, LLP400 S. COUNTY FARM RD. SUITE 200WHEATON, IL 60187UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Homeopathic pharmaceuticals for use in the treatment of colds, influenza, viral infections, gastrointestinal infections, appetite loss, allergies, and immune system deficiencies; Pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment of gastro-intestinal diseases; Pharmaceutical preparations for the prevention of colds, influenza, viral infections, gastrointestinal infections, appetite loss, allergies, and immune system deficiencies; Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of colds, influenza, viral infections, gastrointestinal infections, appetite loss, allergies, and immune system deficiencies; Pharmaceutical products for the treatment of viral and infectious diseases, for the treatment of cancer | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |