USPTO serial 77626410
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica B. Richman
Monica B. Richman Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLPWacker Drive StationP.O. Box 061080Chicago, IL 60606-1080| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network featuring technical information regarding computer hardware and software; Online services, namely, providing an online database featuring information in the field of mobile communications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Online services, namely, providing an online database featuring information in the following fields, namely, electronic circuit designs and computer software applications for technology professionals, computer software and information technology for the development of technologies for the fabrication of automotive electronics for automotive professionals, consumer audio electronics design, portable audio products design, TV and home entertainment audio products design, satellite radio design, design of integrated circuits for automotive and audio signal processing, engineering, information technology, digital television systems and equipment design, networking systems and equipment design, voice and data networking design, digital rights management, advanced display architectures and video codec techniques design, industrial control design, high information technology, mobile communications technology and mobile communications systems architecture, wireless networking technology design, video technology and imaging technology design, all via the Internet; Consulting services in the field of engineering; Semiconductor integrated circuitry and electronic design analysis services, analysis of integrated circuit and electronic designs and process technology, provision of integrated circuit design services, microelectronics engineering consulting services; design analysis of semiconductors for engineering, marketing companies, intellectual property consulting companies, electronics companies, and information technology companies, Design of integrated circuits; process/structural analysis services, namely, analysis of the physical structure of integrated circuits, analysis of processes used to manufacture integrated circuits, and analysis of electronic assemblies at the printed circuit board level, and preparing related technical reports; microprocessor-based security card consulting services, namely, technical consulting services in the field of security access cards featuring embedded microprocessors; Online services, namely, providing a database featuring news and information in the fields of engineering, computers, and electronics design; providing news and information for engineers in the fields of development, design and implementation of electronic technology, high technology, mobile communications technology, mobile communications systems architecture and wireless networking technology; providing a website featuring news and information in the field of mechatronic design for microcontrollers, mechanics and electrical engineers, via the Internet; Product on-line evaluation services of mechatronic design for microcontrollers mechanics and electrical engineers, via the Internet; providing news and information in the field of engineering design, communications technology related to military developing signal processing systems, motion control technology and aerospace technology via the Internet; Providing news and information for engineers in the following fields, namely, design for engineers, design and implementation of electronic technology, engineering design | ACTIVE | Mar 30, 2008 |
| 045 | Technical analysis of semiconductor and electronics patents, patent infringement and validity advisory services respecting semiconductor integrated circuitry and other electrical devices; intellectual property services, namely, consulting services, liaison services, intellectual property identification, intellectual property auditing, intellectual property portfolio development, intellectual property protection, strategy development for intellectual property exploitation, technical analysis of competing products, licensing of intellectual property, patent application preparation, technical evaluation and rating of patents, patent validity assessment, infringement identification and analysis, technical patent infringement and claims analysis argument preparation; expert and factual witness services in legal matters in the field of intellectual property; preparing technical reports on intellectual property evaluations and analysis | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |