USPTO serial 77633715
NIDECON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ULRICH, NANCY G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NIDECON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, conductors, switches, transformers, accumulators and regulators; devices for power electronics, not including fans and blowers for use in computers or small electric motors, namely, integrated circuits and microcontrollers,; inductive components, namely, electrical inductors; low pass inductor filter used in high power electrical applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Power electronics design and power electronics filters design, not including design of fans and blowers for use in computers or small electronics motors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |