USPTO serial 77634256
WILD HIBISCUS FLOWERS IN SYRUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4611668Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2014
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WILD HIBISCUS FLOWERS IN SYRUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wild Hibiscus Flower Company Pty Ltd
Mcgraths Hill, AU
Other trademarks owned by Wild Hibiscus Flower Company Pty Ltd
Wild Hibiscus Flower Company Pty Ltd
Mcgraths Hill, AU
Other trademarks owned by Wild Hibiscus Flower Company Pty Ltd
Wild Hibiscus Flower Company Pty Ltd
Mcgraths Hill, AU
Other trademarks owned by Wild Hibiscus Flower Company Pty Ltd
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on 44(e) pursuant to Australian Foreign Registration Number 1246712 ) Preserved fruits; dried fruit; cooked fruits; processed edible flowers and leaves, being dried,cooked or preserved foodstuffs; jellies; jams; compotes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2007 |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit drinks; liquid sweetener syrups for beverages; fruit juice nectar being beverages; fruit juice nectar for making beverages; non-alcoholic cocktails; non-alcoholic cocktail bases, which are all sold at retail | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2007 |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beer; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; alcoholic cocktail mixes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wild Hibiscus Flower Company Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Wild Hibiscus Flower Company Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Wild Hibiscus Flower Company Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named WILD HIBISCUS FLOWERS IN SYRUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2013 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 28, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 28, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 5, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 11, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |