USPTO serial 77634537
PERFORMANCE CORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4211944Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2012
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERFORMANCE CORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, CA
Montreal, CA
Montreal, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear
JEFFREY L. VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Hardwood plywood; oriented strand board; non-metal modular subfloor panels with an integrated moisture barrier; modular wall system consisting of non-metal wall panels; modular wall system consisting of non-metal wall panels for use in furniture manufacturing, finished flooring, shelving, subflooring, wall systems, and cabinet making; modular system consisting of non-metal wall panels for use in furniture manufacturing, finished flooring, shelving, subflooring | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 9, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |