Drawing for SIERRAPATH

USPTO serial 77634977

SIERRAPATH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIERRAPATH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005TISSUE MARKING DYES FOR DIAGNOSTIC PURPOSES; REAGENTS FOR MEDICAL USEACTIVE
009MICROSCOPES; FUME EXTRACTION HOODS FOR LABORATORY USE; FUME FILTERS FOR LABORATORY USE; MICROSCOPE SLIDE STAINERS; SLIDE PREPARATION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, MANUAL AND AUTOMATIC SLIDE STAINERS AND SLIDE DRYING OVENS AND INCUBATORS; LABORATORY AND SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS, NAMELY, CONSTANT TEMPERATURE WATER BATHS AND CIRCULATORS; TISSUE PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, VACUUM INFILTRATION PROCESSORS; TISSUE EMBEDDING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CRYO EMBEDDING CONSOLES; MICROTOMES; PARTS OF MICROTOMES, NAMELY, DISPOSABLE BLADES FOR MICROTOMES; AUTOMATIC SLIDE COVERSLIPPERS; COVERSLIPS FOR USE IN COVERING MICROSCOPE SLIDES; MICROSCOPE SLIDESACTIVE
010CRYOSTATS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; SAFETY STORAGE CABINETS FITTED FOR MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS; TISSUE CASSETTES FOR MEDICAL USE; FORCEPS FOR MEDICAL USE; PROBES FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; MOLDS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES MADE FROM METAL OR PLASTIC FOR USE IN MOLDING TISSUE SECTIONS IN PARAFFIN WAX; DISPOSABLE BLADES FOR GROSSING AND TISSUE DISSECTION FOR MEDICAL PURPOSESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 10, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 9, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 8, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 28, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 28, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 15, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 15, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 7, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 7, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 7, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 7, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 7, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 18, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 18, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 9, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 9, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 9, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 9, 2009GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Sep 9, 2009GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Sep 9, 2009CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Aug 26, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 26, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 26, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 4, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 23, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance