Drawing for PET PASSION

USPTO serial 77635535

PET PASSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PET PASSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arturo Perez-Guerrero

ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERREROPO BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes, shampoos and conditioners for petsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 23, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 23, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 7, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 26, 2010GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2010GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 30, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 15, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 14, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 14, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 14, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 14, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 21, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance