USPTO serial 77636229
AI SLOT DETECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AI SLOT DETECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motherboards; notebook computers; graphics cards; desktop computers; ultra mobile personal computers (UMPC); barebone computers comprised of partially-assembled platforms or unassembled kits consisting of any combination of a case, power supplies, a motherboard, CPU, RAM, a video card, and/or a cooling system; computer servers; Internet servers; server motherboards; wireless network routers; computer liquid crystal display monitors; sound cards; network interface cards; web cameras; liquid crystal display (LCD) televisions; mobile phones; CPU coolers; power supply units; optical disk drives | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2010 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |