USPTO serial 77636754
THE C.O. BIGELOW FACE COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE C.O. BIGELOW FACE COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | personal care products, namely, after sun creams; after-shave; after-shave balms; after-shave creams; after-shave emulsions; after-shave gel; after-shave lotions; after-sun gels; after-sun lotions; after-sun oils; age retardant gel; age retardant lotion; age spot reducing creams; anti-aging cream; anti-freckle creams; anti-wrinkle creams; astringents for cosmetic purposes; bay rums; beauty creams for body care; beauty gels; beauty lotions; beauty masks; beauty milks; beauty serums; blush; blush pencils; body and beauty care cosmetics; cleansing creams; cold creams; cologne; cologne water; compacts containing make-up; concealers for face and body; cosmetic creams; cosmetic creams for skin care; cosmetic facial blotting papers; cosmetic milks; cosmetic oils; cosmetic pads; cosmetic pencils; cosmetic preparations against sunburn; cosmetic preparations for eye lashes; cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; cosmetic products in the form of aerosols for skin care; cosmetic rouges; cosmetic soaps; cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; cosmetic suntan lotions; cosmetics; cosmetics, namely, compacts; cosmetics, namely, lip primer; cosmetic, namely, lip repairers; cream soaps; creamy face powder; creamy foundation; creamy rouges; depilatories; depilatory creams; dusting powder; eau de parfum; eau de toilette; exfoliant creams; exfoliants for skin; eye compresses for cosmetic purposes; eye cream; eye gels; eye liner; eye lotions; eye make-up; eye make-up remover; eye pencils; eye shadows; eyebrow colors; eyebrow pencils; eyeliner; eyeshadows; face beauty creams; face creams; face glitter; face lotions; face milk; face creams; face powder; facial beauty masks; facial cleansers; facial cleansing milk; facial concealer; facial creams; facial emulsions; facial lotion; facial make-up; facial masks; facial scrubs; facial washes; foams containing cosmetics and sunscreens; foundation; gel eye masks; hair removing cream; lip balm; lip cream; lip gloss; lip gloss palatte; lip liner; lip polisher; lipstick; lipstick holders; lipsticks; liquid perfumes; liquid soaps for face; loose face powder; make up removing preparations; make-up for the face and body; make-up kits comprised of lipstick; lip gloss; blush and eye shadow; make-up pencils; make-up powder; make-up remover; make-up removing lotions; make-up removing milk; gel; lotions and creams; mascaras; moisturizing creams; moisturizing milks; night cream; non-medicated acne treatment preparations; non-medicated lip care preparations; non-medicated lip protector; non-medicated ointments for the prevention and treatment of sunburn; non-medicated skin creams; non-medicated sun care preparations; paraffin wax for cosmetic purposes; patches containing sun screen and sun block for use on the skin; pencils for cosmetic purposes; perfume; perfume oils; perfumed creams; perfumed powders; perfumed soaps; pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes; pre-shave creams; pressed face powder; rouges; SPF sunblock towelettes; sachet-like eye pillows containing fragrances; sachets; shaving balm; shaving creams; shaving foams; shaving gels; shaving lotions; shaving mousse; shaving preparations; shaving soap; skin bronzer; skin bronzing creams; skin care preparations, namely, chemical peels for skin; skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum; skin clarifiers; skin cleansers; skin cleansing cream; skin cleansing lotion; skin conditioners; skin creams; skin creams in liquid and solid form; skin emollients; skin gels for accelerating; enhancing or extending tans; skin lightening creams; skin lotions; skin masks; skin moisturizer; skin moisturizer masks; skin soap; skin toners; sun block; sun block preparations; sun care lotions; sun creams; sun screen; sun screen preparations; sun tan lotion; sun tan oil; sun-block lotions; sunscreen creams; suntanning preparations tanning creams; vanishing cream; wax for removing body hair; wrinkle removing skin care preparations; wrinkle resistant cream; aloe-vera gel for cosmetic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | acne treatment preparations; antiseptic gel; acne treatment preparations in the nature of blemish pads and preparations for treating blemishes; cold sore treatment preparations; medicated lip salve; styptic pencils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bigelow Merchandising, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Bigelow Merchandising, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named THE C.O. BIGELOW FACE COLLECTION
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |