USPTO serial 77637073
PUMPWELL SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4203991Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2012
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PUMPWELL SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, AB T2E 6L7, CA
Calgary, AB T2E 6L7, CA
Calgary, AB T2E 6L7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Regina M. Corrigan
Regina M. Corrigan GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP421 - 7th Avenue SW1600CALGARY, ALBERTA, T2P4K9Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Oil well controllers, namely, an electrical controller with current microprocessor technology including algorithms to provide protection to producing oil well components, automation components such as variable frequency drive or soft-starter to enhance well performance by controlling well operation trough control of the well's electrical motor and data logging algorithms to record and relay information from various sensors attached to oil producing well | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Oil well monitoring services, namely, remote monitoring of well performance and condition of the well in real time with use of wireless Internet technology and current microprocessor technology to ensure efficient and uninterrupted well operation; oil well optimization services, namely, the design of well components through the use of algorithms, and controlling the operation of wells through the use of algorithms, both for the purpose of ensuring maximization of well productivity and minimization of loading and well component break-downs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pumpwell Solutions Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Pumpwell Solutions Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Pumpwell Solutions Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PUMPWELL SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2012 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |