USPTO serial 77638077
MICRODOSE THERAPEUTX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICRODOSE THERAPEUTX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Monmouth Junction, NJ
MONMOUTH JUNCTION, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Capsules sold empty for vitamins, pharmaceuticals and supplements; and capsules containing two or more vitamins; drug delivery agents in the form of capsules that provide controlled release of the active ingredients for a wide variety of pharmaceutical | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Vitamin, supplement and pharmaceutical agent packaging machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, inhalers, nebulizers, non-invasive injectors sold empty, and meters therefore for administrating therapeutic and nutritional agents | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development and testing of new products for others in the healthcare and nutritional fields | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRODOSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRODOSE THERAPEUTX, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MICRODOSE THERAPEUTX
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |