USPTO serial 77640900
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Kwun Tong, Kowloon, HK
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, jeans, riveted heavy weight denim jeans, trousers, bib overalls, shorts, dresses, pants, overalls, overcoats, shirts, T-shirts, vests, skirts, jackets, coats, sweaters, sweatshirts, sweatpants, outer shirts, slacks, underwear, undershirts, undervests, blazers, pullovers, suits, blouses, blousons, wind resistant jackets, brassieres, briefs, gloves, scarves, waistcoats, chemises, golf shirts, tank tops, jerseys, turtlenecks, warm-up suits, parkas, ponchos, swimwear, bikinis, swim trunks, rainwear, raincoats, sleepwear, pajamas, robes, lingerie, hats, caps, wool hats, visors, headbands, ear muffs, wristbands, bathrobes, boxer shorts, cloth bibs, ties, belts, stockings, socks, hosiery, sneakers, shoes, boots, beach shoes, slippers, sandals, suspenders; sports wear, namely, sport coats, sports jackets, sports jerseys, sports jumpers, sports overalls, sports shirts, sports socks, sports sweaters; footwear; headgear, namely, hats and caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail, department and supermarket store services featuring eyewear, optical goods, jewelry of precious metals, horological and chronometric instruments, precious stones, stationery, writing instruments, paper and paper products, printed matter, gift wrapping materials and ribbons, leather goods, goods of imitation leather, animal skins, hides, bags, trunks and traveling bags, wallets, clothing for pets, collars for animals, umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks, textile and textile goods, clothing and fashion accessories, footwear, and headgear; retail distributorship services featuring eyewear, optical goods, jewelry of precious metals, horological and chronometric instruments, precious stones, stationery, writing instruments, paper and paper products, printed matter, gift wrapping materials and ribbons, leather goods, goods of imitation leather, animal skins, hides, bags, trunks and traveling bags, wallets, clothing for pets, collars for animals, umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks, textile and textile goods, clothing and fashion accessories, footwear, and headgear; wholesale ordering services and on-line retail store services featuring eyewear, optical goods, jewelry of precious metals, horological and chronometric instruments, precious stones, stationery, writing instruments, paper and paper products, printed matter, gift wrapping materials and ribbons, leather goods, goods of imitation leather, animal skins, hides, bags, trunks and traveling bags, wallets, clothing for pets, collars for animals, umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks, textile and textile goods, clothing and fashion accessories, footwear, and headgear; advertising and marketing services; advertising agencies; dissemination of advertising matter; direct mail advertising; on-line sales support, namely, online advertising and marketing services; demonstration of goods and services by electronic means, also for the benefit of the so-called teleshopping and home shopping services; sample distribution; window dressing and display arrangement services; organizing, promoting and conducting exhibitions and trade shows for business purposes featuring booths and displays relating to antiques and collectibles; business inquiries; business research and marketing studies; providing statistical information about business marketing; arranging of publication of publicity texts; arranging of newspaper subscription for others; business appraisals; business management; business management and business consultation with respect to import-export agencies; industrial management assistance; personnel management consulting; public relations; production, preparation and oral presentation of advertising matter; rental of advertising space; telephone answering services; business consultation related to franchising; auctioneering; cost price analysis; mailing lists preparation | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2012 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |