USPTO serial 77640964
EAST WEST CUISINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EAST WEST CUISINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Pre-packaged refrigerated meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |