USPTO serial 77641798
INTELLIGENT IMAGE RESIZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLIGENT IMAGE RESIZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emil Chang
EMIL CHANG VENTURE PACIFIC LAW, PC5201 GREAT AMERICA PKWY STE 270SANTA CLARA, CA 95054-1126UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semiconductors, semiconductor processors, semiconductor processor chips, integrated circuits, integrated circuit chips, circuit boards, microcontrollers, microprocessors, computer memories and semiconductor wafers; semiconductors for processing images; semiconductors for correcting images; semiconductors for resizing images; semiconductors for display devices; semiconductors for display driving devices; semiconductors for televisions; semiconductors for media players; semiconductors for digital picture frames; semiconductors for time keeping apparatus with digital displays; semiconductors for networking; multimedia processors; computer software, computer programs and firmware all for use with all of the foregoing; multimedia software and applications recorded on CD-ROM featuring integrated text, audio and video presentations; computer hardware, namely, multimedia hardware and firmware for use in the processing, correction, resizing and display of digital files, including video, text, binary, moving pictures, still images, graphics, and multimedia files; and instructional material, namely, development manuals, product specifications and instruction sheets provided as a unit with all of the foregoing; computer software, namely, software for application integration and communications software for connecting computer network users and global computer networks; computer operating system software, image processing software, image correction software, image resizing software; computer operating programs; and computer software and hardware for the facilitation of third party software applications for image display, image processing image correction and resizing; computer software for computer system and application development, deployment and management | ACTIVE | Sep 9, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |