USPTO serial 77642156
AMAZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMAZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John D. Gugliotta
JOHN D. GUGLIOTTA PATENT, COPYRIGHT & TRADEMARK LAW GROUP, LLCPO BOX 506RICHFIELD, OH 44286-0506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Human hair shampoos and conditioners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 19, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 17, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |