USPTO serial 77643599
CENTROME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CENTROME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Little Rock, AR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Amplifier for wireless communications; Antennas for wireless communications apparatus; Automated security gates; Automated self contained electronic surveillance devices that can be deployed to gather evidence or intelligence in remote locations; Climate control systems consisting of digital thermostats, air conditioning, heating, ventilation and drying control devices; Computer hardware, namely, wireless network repeaters; Computer software for wireless content delivery; Devices for wireless radio transmission; Electric control devices for heating and energy management; Electric light dimmers; Electric light switches; Home and office automation systems comprising wireless and wired controllers, controlled devices, and software for lighting, HVAC, security, safety and other home and office monitoring and control applications; Home theater products, namely, LCD; Industrial automation controls; Integrated circuits and integrated circuit cores for use in wireless communications and wireless communication equipment and apparati and digital signal processors (DSP); Lighting control panels; Lighting control software for use in commercial and industrial facilities; Mobile computing and operating platforms consisting of data transceivers, wireless networks and gateways for collection and management of data; Occupancy sensors, namely, electronic devices which detect the presence of occupants and control the lighting system accordingly; Reconfigurable processors for use in wireless communication handsets and network equipment in the field of wideband communications; Wireless computer peripherals; Wireless controller to monitor and control the functioning of other electronic devices; Wireless remote temperature and humidity monitors for building maintenance; Wireless transceiver radio | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |