Drawing for VEGA

USPTO serial 77647827

VEGA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, ERIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VEGA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edwin Tarver

EDWIN TARVER LAUSON & TARVER LLP880 APOLLO ST STE 301EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-4782UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Headphones, Personal headphones for use with sound transmitting systems; Communications headsets; headsets for telephones; telephone headsets, earphones; ear phonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 15, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 15, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 15, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 22, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 13, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 13, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 6, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance