USPTO serial 77649295
INTELLACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | consulting services regarding healthcare costs; pharmacy services, namely, providing pharmaceutical benefit optimization guidance and advice; retail pharmacy services | ABANDONED | Feb 17, 2009 |
| 036 | pharmacy benefit management services, namely, pharmacy benefit management clinical program to review and analyze lab data, medical data and pharmacy claims so as to better manage benefits; pharmaceutical benefit management services; consulting and advice services in the field of healthcare benefits | ABANDONED | Feb 17, 2009 |
| 044 | consulting and advice services regarding pharmaceuticals, prescription drugs, medications, and general health and wellness; pharmacy services, namely, providing pharmaceutical information and alternatives to existing or prescribed medications; provision of pharmaceutical, medication, drug, and healthcare information via telephone, websites on global and other computer networks, and direct mailings; medical counseling in the nature of drug therapy counseling and disease management counseling; consulting services in the field of health, namely, options to improve patients' health | ABANDONED | Feb 17, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 4, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 4, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |