USPTO serial 77649413
ZEROº
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZEROº?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
GARDEN SPRING BEVERAGE CORPORATION
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by GARDEN SPRING BEVERAGE CORPORATION
GARDEN SPRING BEVERAGE CORPORATION
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by GARDEN SPRING BEVERAGE CORPORATION
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, spirit-based coolers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 29TH STREET BEVERAGE COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by GARDEN SPRING BEVERAGE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by GARDEN SPRING BEVERAGE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by 29TH STREET BEVERAGE COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named ZEROº
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 29, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 6, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | PBIR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |