USPTO serial 77649580
TENSABOWL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TENSABOWL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Milton Keynes, GB
Milton Keynes, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | merchandising display fixture in the shape of a plastic bowl used to sell various goods and products to consumers as they wait in the check out line | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |