USPTO serial 77649763
JOHN WAYNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOHN WAYNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan J. Barricella
Susan J. Barricella Rutan & Tucker611 Anton Boulevard, 14th FloorCosta Mesa, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food, namely, frozen, prepared or packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; protein bars, namely, protein based nutrient-dense snack bars; meat and meat products, namely, luncheon meats, hot dogs and hamburgers; jerky; prepared snacks and meals mainly consisting of poultry, fish, meat, eggs, cheese, fruits and vegetables; soups; processed nuts; pickles; snack foods, namely, dairy-based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; fruit, meat, and vegetable based snack foods; chilled, frozen or refrigerated entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables and desserts consisting of pies, all sold together as meals; beverages, namely, dairy-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Food namely, pasta, pizza, bakery products, namely, bread and pastry; confectionery namely, candies, chewing gum, cakes, cookies, frozen confectionery including ice cream and frozen yogurt; beverages, namely, coffee, tea; sauces; cereals namely, breakfast cereals; products for meat, namely, seasoned coatings, spice rubs, sauces and tenderizers; crackers; seasonings; processed popcorn; salad dressing; prepared snacks and snack foods, namely, cereal, corn, wheat, grain, granola and rice based snacks and snack foods, chilled, frozen or refrigerated and ready for assembly and cooking; puddings | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Beverages, namely alcoholic beverages except beers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wayne Enterprises, LP
- Other trademarks owned by JOHN WAYNE ENTERPRISES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by JOHN WAYNE ENTERPRISES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named JOHN WAYNE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |