USPTO serial 77650559
ALLENS NATURALLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLENS NATURALLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | LIQUID AND POWDER LAUNDRY DETERGENTS, AUTOMATIC DISHWASHER DETERGENT, ALL PURPOSE CLEANERS, DISHWASHING LIQUID, GLASS CLEANERS, FRUIT AND VEGETABLE WASH | ACTIVE | Apr 22, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 11, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 11, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |