USPTO serial 77651712
KIMORA LEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIMORA LEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Ornamental novelty buttons, press buttons, rivet buttons, and campaign buttons; ornamental novelty pins; hat pins; hat ornaments not of precious metal; ornamental bows of textile for decoration; safety pins; ribbons; ornamental ribbons made of textiles; ribbons for wrapping and gift wrapping; elastic ribbons; sewing boxes; clothing and shirt buttons; embroidered patches for clothing; cloth patches for clothing; ornamental cloth patches; embroidered emblems; belt buckles not of precious metal; clothing buckles; belt clasps; zippers and zipper pulls; snap fasteners; clasps for clothing; hair accessories, namely, hair ties, hair ornaments, hair pins, barrettes, hair bands, hair ribbons, hair bows, ponytail holders, hair bows with clips, hair clips, hair fasteners, hair buckles, clam clips for hair, claw clips, twisters, hair scrunchies, snap clips, ornamental combs worn on hair; hair roller clips and pins, bobby pins, curling pins, waving pins for the hair, hair nets, hair wraps, hair curl clips, sleep clips, salon clips, hair frosting caps, non-electric hair curlers and rollers, braids, and braiding pins; artificial plants and flowers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2011 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |