USPTO serial 77651773
RICHU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RICHU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Athletic flooring; Bamboo flooring; Building materials, namely, manufactured brick veneer for use on interior and exterior walls, floors and surfaces, patios, poolsides and driveways; Ceramic tiles for flooring and facing; Ceramic tiles for flooring and lining; Ceramic tiles for tile floors and coverings; Chemically treated wood, namely, wood beams, wood boards, wood joists, wood rafters, wood siding, wood tile floors and flooring, wood trim, wooden beams, wooden flooring, wooden railings, and wooden wainscoting, all of the above containing a fire retardant chemical; Concrete floors; Construction materials, namely, a nonmetal sub-floor membrane for residential and commercial soundproofing use; Cork tiles and tiles of cork-based conglomerates for floor, wall and ceiling coverings; Engineered hardwood flooring; Fabric for underlayment of flooring; Floor boards; Floor panels not of metal; Floor patching materials, namely, concrete sealers; Floor tiles of wood; Flooring underlayment made of cork; Flooring underlayments; Laminate flooring; Non-metal expansion joints for floors and walls; Non-metal floor tiles; Non-metal floors; Non-metal self-aligning demountable snap fasteners consisting of press fasteners and press studs for use in attaching panels, hatches, floors and furniture in buildings; Nonmetal door parts for buildings, namely, adjusters for adjusting the height of a door, floor boards, columns, beams, paneling boards, sills, sleepers, backings for ceilings or walls, stiles, rails and ceiling boards; Parquet floor boards; Parquet flooring; Parquet flooring and parquet slabs; Parquet flooring made of cork; Parquet flooring made of wood; Parquet flooring of cork; Parquet flooring of cork and of cork-based conglomerates; Parquet flooring of wood; Parquet wood flooring; Portable dance floors; Rock materials used in the manufacture of flooring, roofing, countertops, walls, cladding and fireplaces; Rubber floor tiles; Rubber flooring; Synthetic flooring materials or wall-claddings; Tiles of clay, glass, gypsum, ceramic or earthenware; Underlay for laminate flooring; Veneer for floors; Vinyl flooring; Wood sports floors; Wood tile floors; Wooden flooring | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZHANG, MINYI
- Other trademarks owned by ZHANG, FANG T
- Other trademarks owned by ZHANG, MINYI
- Other trademarks owned by ZHANG, FANG T
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named RICHU
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |