USPTO serial 77652388
RUBY RAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUBY RAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laval, Quebec, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags, namely, sports bags, gym bags, beach bags, diaper bags, backpacks, handbags, travel bags, school bags, shoe bags for travel, fanny packs, hiking bags, shoulder bags, tote bags, baby carriers worn on the body | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, sweaters, T-shirts, camisoles, vests, cardigans, turtlenecks, dresses, underwear, culottes, midriff tops, slips, pants, jeans, jackets, Bermuda shorts, shorts, skirts, suits, jumpsuits, overalls, blouses, blazers, ski suits, overcoats, parkas, anoraks, raincoats, rain slickers, sweatshirts, hooded sweatshirts, jerseys, jogging outfits, mittens, gloves, pajamas, nightgowns, baby doll pajamas, nighties, dressing gowns, bathrobes, sleeping garments, baby bibs not of paper, beachwear, swim suits, leotards, coats, slipovers, polo shirts, boxer shorts; headwear, namely, hats, skull caps, berets, headbands, kerchiefs, ear muffs, toques, caps; fashion accessories, namely, belts, suspenders, neckties, scarves, bandannas; footwear, namely, street shoes, leisure shoes, sports footwear, beach footwear, children's footwear, evening footwear, exercise footwear, fishing footwear, golf footwear, winter footwear, rain footwear, ski footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |